Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:17

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Bryce Huff thankful he landed with 49ers - NBC Sports
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Steelers Address Mason Rudolph Trump Rally Appearance In Email To Fans - TMZ
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
‘Strawberry Moon’ June 2025: See The Lowest Full Moon Since 2006 - Forbes
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Zika Virus Is Back After 6 Years in One of the Most Popular U.S. Tourist Destinations - AOL.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
The everyday activity that can reveal your brain’s age - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
China accuses US of ‘severely violating’ trade truce - Financial Times
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What are some good romantic novels?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Shemar Stewart Calls Out Bengals Front Office As Contract Clash Continues - Sports Illustrated